The Euroscience Open Forum – ESOF is an interdisciplinary, pan – European general science meeting, which aims to: Showcase the latest advances in science and technology, Promote a dialogue on the role of science and technology in society and public policy, Stimulate and provoke public interest, excitement and debate about science and technology.
In 2012, Dublin is the European City of Science and hosts ESOF2012 from the 11th to the 15th July. The event will bring together over 5,000 scientists, business leaders, government officials, policy-makers and international scientific media representatives to discuss the best of European science and to address all of the current major global scientific challenges, including Energy, Climate Change, Food and Health.
Throughout 2012 there will be a number of major events scheduled including; ESOF2012 Euroscience Open Forum July 11th – 15th 2012 ESOF2012 Public Engagement Programme January – December 2012 ESOF2012 Partner Conference Programme January – December 2012
The Open Forum in July will incorporate a number of distinct streams.
A Science programme of seminars, workshops and debates on the latest research. An Enterprise Research programme to link basic research with business and industrial applications. A Careers programme showcasing career opportunities at all levels in Europe and beyond for all levels of researchers at all stages of their careers. A Media programme to promote science communication. An Exhibition to showcase the best of European academic, public and private research.
A key highlight during the ESOF2012 Science programme will be the Global Partnership Symposia Series in which eminent scientists from Europe and partnering nations/continents will discuss in a symposium format four critical global scientific topics as follows:
- Europe & China (Science and the City of the Future);
- Europe & India (Our Nuclear Future);
- Europe & USA (The Atlantic: a Shared Resource);
- Europe & Africa (Science for Economic Development).
Submissions are now being sought for the scientific programme. Please go to www.ESOF2012.org to submit your session proposal.
Iskren Azmanov – iazmanov@excite.com
Dedication with great respect to
† Professor Lawrence Badash – 1934-2010 UCSB
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
The Archimedes Paradox
And the engineering of the Egyptian Pyramids
Abstract
In the report I do some comparisons as the Egyptians millenniums before the “discoveries” by Archimedes have in applications “his, Archimedes” “discoveries” regarding the Pyramids projecting and buildings. Also I describe for first about the unknown technology of the creation of the Pyramids.
Total: 5 312 Words…
Iskren Azmanov
The Archimedes Paradox
And the engineering of the Egyptian Pyramids
Nationalistic Problems that are coming by the History:
The technology of science-looks as frauds
The ancient Greek False Nationalism and its Developing already over
2-thowsand years in all Europe and in Britannica
More in details over Archimedes and his unusual Paradox…
Really it exist bigger problem connected with the personality of Archimedes and the History of Physics. He is honored as the colossal as creator of the planimetry, /the plane geometry/ the geometry, creator of the physics, with great contributions to the astronomy. Do not exist in the history of the Science and the Humanity contributed so much for the Science! Do not exist second as him.
But around Archimedes I see very unusual singularity, curiosity and unique paradox. That is a dogma with “the science”-like fraud.
Remark – the life of Alexander the Great is between 351 and 323 BC.
Archimedes is living with distance about over a century, but that is not very precisely. The difference between the dates of his death it is 111 years. Archimedes dies the year 212, Alexander at the year 323. We have the difference 323-212 = 111 years.
The all life of Archimedes is long 75 years /287 – 212 = 75/. If we subtract by the year of the birth of Alexander – 356 by the number of the year of the birth of Archimedes – /356 – 287 = 69/. That counting gives us idea for some considerations. If be possible Alexander’s the Great life to be longer 69 when were born Archimedes and some as 6 more until 75 we have need 6, by that counting exist the reality as contemporary people to be speakers at the child time of Archimedes.
Alexander dies young at age 33. But if his life were 75 – it was really possible the attitude between them to be as “grandfather” to Archimedes – /356 – 75 = 281/. It is understandable as between them exist only single generation as difference. But in the reality they are covered. With that remark stay as evidences stream questions and questions that upset the both and his similarity. But the interests also stay over that big number of questions that never upset them and never become as interest for them, if we can be able by the distance of the time to determine them. Which questions are far away for the peoples of the Alexander’s Phalanx connected with the contemporary conditions of the facts has important theoretical interest valid for the History as science? That side is connected with the imaginations of the understandings over the structures of the solid matter. Here is the eventuality idea how technologically can be produced by the human solid matter.
That the Egyptian civilization were destroyed by the Phalanx of Alexander the Great that is known as that is the absolutely truth already over two thousand years. The soldiers of the Phalanx kills all Egyptian slave-holding system, all slave-owners and any dangerous one, but they are absolutely disable to destroy all that is built by the Egyptians – pyramids, water channel systems, wall-paintings, frescoes, ceramic, agriculture near the river Nile, sphinxes. All those are stone, rock produced. The ideologists of the Phalanx have contempt the political importance for creation that kind Pyramids. They never late use that idea for his purposes in those variants. Buildings of tombs for the noble Hellenic people that look as the Egyptian model we have not in the history and in the archaeology as before Alexander and after in the Hellenic territory.
That is indication that they hate that kind of tombs, they do not like even any modification for them late in any adaptable form for them. But with the “Thracians” that exist!!! The Thracians create tombs for his noble leaders. The Thracians build his tombs by soil, as round hill, not exactly as with the Egyptians.
The Egyptians Pyramids are archaeological existence with bigger historical distance over 5 thousands years before Archimedes, and more centuries. The basic configuration and the form of the Egyptian Pyramids is the mathematic of the triangle, the square, and the Pyramid with its capacity mathematically definition and with all line statutes and law of the trigonometry, as we named today. They exists also astronomical landmarks and points with the sky as orientations.
The period of stay in Egypt for Archimedes is not very clear how long it is. Some writings by his period point as it is 12 years.
The intellectual elite of the Hellenics becomes as event not by the continental, the late territoriality of the ancient Greece, but by those who are the island inhabited Hellenics only and with priority. Archimedes is the most typical in that direction evidence and example. Intellectual Hellenic one is he, but by islands model of his forming.
But the circumstances that slavery system of Egypt yet is destroyed and all there is not dangerous to be studied, investigated and researched illustrate, that inquisitive Greeks visit the oldest miracle Egypt and all there is under observation, study, and described for some purposes as lectures evidently at his late returning in his island fatherlands between the other Greeks. The feeding of the villages and the towns for the islands territory is very easy – fish, clams, birds and eggs olives, cuttlefish – eating of all that and many other sea-food is easy for consummation row. The islands not need fire all millenniums by the past. Hunting all that food is possible without any metal, only by hands. By the very old time the island habitants reach there by the trunks free destroyed by the storms. The boats late for contacts at the very primitive times between the small islands are produced very simple technology – knitting by green sticks and covering with row skin by rabbits or dogs.
But the main priority for the islands populations is as they do not have historically enemy. The island isolation is the absolutely guaranty as that populations do not have enemies. The island is surrounded by water and it is never come the need to be build fortified wall or any kind of fortifications for defending by aggressors many century before the developed the contacts in active forms. At all his pre-antic period the island Hellenics has the perfect chance never to be attacked, and in other way they formed active ideology as aggressors. But with the activities of the Hellenic people we can see big group of ideas that they despise. Many of that existing ideas and experience are documented by the civilization, and the Hellenic totally ignored them. They do not like to study them – elsewhere they have contemptuously attitude. By that way is possible we to explain the interrupting in the technological understanding toward the civilization by the building experience.
It is simple for understanding and explanation that Archimedes in his handwritings marked many older mathematical, physical and architectural, also astronomical yet existed knowledge for technological and architectural decisions – already long time created by the Egyptians on Greek writing and noting using as writings by the black Africans – the Egyptians.
It is remarkable as in the old Jewish literature we do not have mathematical or other evidences about the Archimedes heroism as creator of group of sciences.
The existing the Pyramids is an evidence as the black Africans by Egypt owned many millenniums before Archimedes “his” – “discoveries” over the mathematics and the practical architecture and buildings. The building of any of the Pyramid needs knowledge and many precise instruments all triangulation measurements, apparatus, horizontal lines and plenty of experience. But in very strange direction is also the hydraulic “discovery” of Archimedes Hydraulic screw, the sunk and moved up volumes liquids. Those also looks as observed and taken and only described by Archimedes. Late all Hellenic chauvinism suggest to all European world as that are the discoveries by Archimedes.
But the real technology for the building the Pyramids Archimedes is disables to know, to guess or grasp. That is true because the “work” of the Phalanx has destroyed all builders groups – all engineering and architectural and the measurement staff and all heavy workers, or slaves, captured by the white population of old communities as slavery.
And see we to gives advantage to Archimedes historical scientific priority as contributions as discoveries belongs to other civilization, and that is different model of intellectual complex is scientifically not correct, because is also not historically truth, and all event with Archimedes it is a paradox to all XXI century already in the back. All is a fraud in the science with Greek stamp. As in the science exist continuity at all next XXII century we do not have second one Greek scientist by the Physics. Do not have also mathematician late, but the succession must be, but we do not have and here stay the paradox as chain.
The historical role of Egypt, and all Africa as continent of the beginning the civilization we do not have right to ignore in favor of old Hellenics.
The event of the conflict against the Egypt shows war between two national systems in very different levels of development and also with racial base. With the destruction of the intellectual elite of the first system are lost many knowledge, experience, and traditions, technologies, theoretical already existed standards disappeared. Some of all is saved, after study over all, but not all by the victor. But we can find many details elements connected with them. Certainly exist many language problems are that create to disappear much scientific knowledge.
Even now all African continental model because its own typically individuality never late develop itself with different intellectual successes with new models of civilization and Africa did not offer some new already for all last XXIII century. And nothing new we have until now as sorry for me and all of us.
In my fly to Ethiopia some years ago the pilot offer us interesting show – he pass very close over the Pyramid’s valley next to the Great Nile. By that way I have the unusual chance me to see in the both ways that architectural miracle of the Egypt Pyramids twice by the sky.
By that profile by all historical past is visible the notion as the antic cultures has long periods of lethargy. The example with China has different value. Chine for period with the same distance as with Africa did not create other novelty as discovery with marvelous value except the basic 7 discoveries of China. To the old China belongs the 7 main discovery of the antiquity: the paper, the gun powder, the compass, the porcelain (china), the architecture of the Great China Wall, all hydraulics of the Yellow river with many irrigation capabilities, and the antagonism between the religion systems of Buda and Confucius that are with similar distances as with the Mediterranean stories.
To whom belongs the inventing the technologies of the production the iron and the steel the strongest metals stay open for real knowledge.
A specific and new detailed investigation over the African type’s models cultural is important to be done now. We have big numbers of old artifacts in Egypt and Africa but all must reanalyze under new criteria.
In Adua – Ethiopia exist stone stele /that was stolen by Mussolini/ monolith rock long 24 meters. That stone-monument was broken before several centuries at the time of the war near Adua, but that rock might be longer before. That kind of manufacturing if be by stone-cutters way is impossible without iron tools is impossible, but looks produced by those. Here exists engravings and relief as cut. If that producing method is by casters way it is request why we do not have historical description over that technology if the Hellenics really have deep arrived in Ethiopia. That Adua-mountain probably is older than 3 millenniums. But it exists visible deferments contradictions connected with the characteristics of that Adua – stele.
The stone is the hardest body of the nature. The greatest paradox stay in the ignorance of the creation over the history connected with the physics of that in simple models. The first Egyptians do not have do not have close to them mountains by them to cut pieces and to move them and by that way to build the Pyramids, but they have that architectural miracle and even now we do not know how they build that his miracles. The very-old-Egyptians do not have technology for manufacturing rocks, even small stones. They do not have iron saw by steel strong power to be able to cut and do some mason jobs. They do not have iron hammers or iron chisels, also iron nails. And they create his not yet non-answerable Pyramids. That is – how long question 2 or 20 millenniums? I have not answered even my main subject stay as the history of the technology in all directions.
But let be back again over Archimedes. The Greeks at his time did not gave us the mastering of the Pyramids, but that mastering exist one or 10 millenniums before the Hellenics or specifically “the scientist” Archimedes. Here we have two directions of thinking. One is the mathematical way of architectural creation – absolutely not known to the Greeks and untruly ascribe to Archimedes and to the Greeks.
The other way of understanding is – it is probably the Egyptians kept as secret those his technology, but I do not believe in that way as impossible as with millions slaves that are contacted in all that creation and they are doing that all miracle architecture. Slaves elsewhere must run away and to escape. Those major people, slaves even ignorant must have some interview with the lettering Greeks late.
Or simple explanation – with the war work of the Phalanx all engineering staff together with the technologists and the architects and the black workers are all kill. And late is capable to explain the processes of all that experience. Evidently the engineering and the slaves abandoned that knowledge.
Or simply the Greeks hated that egocentric construction and all mathematical actions and abandoned any attention over the Pyramids.
The main contribution of the Phalanx is as was socially late impossible the white man to be slave to the black Egyptians and to work under his directions and projects. For the buildings of the Pyramid the black Egyptians captures as slaves white people that are in north by them. And all that create the racial conflict against the blacks. Racial attitudes and also big historical conflicts by that nature are active. Racial moment is the first reason understandable now.
But the miracle of the action of Moses with the dividing the Red see stay as gigantic legend to give us exceptional value of the expressing the amazing sufferings and pains of all humanity at that far distance time and the needs for freedom. Moses has the great purpose to gives the freedom to all Jewish people that becomes the first geographical possibility to be captured slaves, and that Jewish all are white people.
And probably they are tremendous contempt against the building of that antic Pyramids for some stupid Pharaoh to be given so heavy work. And for that evidently the generations behind that last creation of Pyramid abandon that and all stay forgotten.
But the same exist with the events with the Thracian? Why with them we have found some similar variant of similarity?
But “the paradox with Archimedes” unprecedented is printed in all European and World Encyclopedias on all languages including in Britannica and already many century stay inside as uncritical and stat there under modification and not correct for the World range of history variant. Also the genius of Einstein except his Nobel Price disposing his theory of the relativity mix himself with his unknown reality over that paradox. And that create a new paradox for the science between the Nobel wieners.
* * *
In his monograph J.G. Landers /”Engineering in the Ancient World” – 1978 – published by University of California Press /Berkeley & Los Angeles did glorify in the same stile as many, and many authors for the notorious Archimedes, is basic notorious, but he also mention the skepticism against Archimedes pointed Marcellus. /p.187 by Marcellus/. Probably J. G. Landers uses the published 1917 “The Parallel Lives by Plutarch” /Loeb Classical Library ed. 1917.
And it is understandable, because the Greeks lost the island Sicily with a the town Syracuse and the Greeks create many war-technological improbability with the future dream to have back again that island from the Romans, that never in the future become real and possible.
But also J. G. Landers uses the book by T .L. Heath – “The works of Archimedes” /Dover, N.Y. 1958/. He also uses non-critically that all statements over the works of Archimedes as “scientific persuasive” by theoretically levels, but not proved by real examples as experimentalism.
I challenge now someone, probably any young student to organize systematical comparative research between the real needs by scientific knowledge that have in application the black Egyptians and the all Archimedology as balance of the real using data in the building the Pyramids so long by now as 5 000 or 15 000 years ago, not clear even on correct way even now, but perfectly in full use all contemporary experimental applications and all achievements in all science directions, and all for the past looks exactly as nationalistic construction with like scientific arguments in support of his Greek nationalism. But with the comparisons all looks as pseudo-scientific construction. And all archaeological evidences are arguments against the Archimedology as paradox for the science in comparison against the slavery constructed Egyptian governmental system at that far and old antic period.
In our cosmic age now, we do not have example similar for understanding as the “Archimedes paradox” representing in the Mediterranean civilization until to our contemporary days…
All monograph “Engineering in the Ancient World” is addressed with observations over the Greek – Roman engineering directions and here exist full eliminations of the real achievements of the Egypt experience.
Only the man-factor stay under some attention and it is mainly by the war, and military reasons. It is next to that man-factor is the similarity by the analysis of the man-power as protruding of the difference between the architectural and all other technology directions. J. G. Landers /p.10/ generalize: “Though the Pharaohs in Egypt may have had vast resources of manpower, Greek and Roman building contractors rarely had more than a small labour force, and in any case, no matter how many they have assembled for the more ambitious projects, they could never have man-handled the larger stones used in classical buildings…”
The paradox of Archimedes become inspired by the Greeks to the Romans with the purpose to suggest his intellectual superiority in rivalry that exists about longer than a thousand years after the capturing the Sicily island and away them from Egypt, Africa and late the conflicts between the Western Roman Empery and Byzantium as nationalistic bases of all that historical reality.
The secrets of the builders’ technology in the ancient Egypt!
In my hands come as rediscovery that super-secret of the Pharaohs architects and all engineering experience at my research that I did in Ethiopia 1972 – 1973. In my visit next to Shashamane-town a funeral ceremony with interest as researcher – in the corner of the cemetery I have seen, a single man non understanding English and without any communications between us I observed some as unusual that he did. It was impossible at that moment me to ask help by translator. The old man was crying wet with his weep and tear-drops. Next to him was fresh grave. Around him was four buckets. Two full with hen eggs and the other two with sand. He finished next on the hard place by several glass on the ground casting form with the model of typical Amharic cross with other six additional forms specific and all that supported with wooden sticks his grave-cross was ready for “cementing”. Also he was with trowel, the masonry tool.
My big question was connected with the eggs. Do not exist any religion reason or people around that man brings two buckets with about 5 -6 hundreds eggs and to keep them in the cemetery. I simply with respect to him gave to him a silver Emperors coin. The respect and his bending thankfulness was for me evidence as that man is very poor and wretched and in very deep religious honoring directed to the relative for who he was here. As he take the silver coin he start to broke the eggs, all of them was raw, and to collect its yellow and white contents together dividing the shells and all eggs liquid fill the bucket after that he start mixing by hands sand moving that in the eggs bucket. When he mix all that eggs and sand together – and empty that wet paste in the casting cross form. With his fingers he fix in the center of that not yet ready cross my silver coin and formed in the drying sand-eggs casting some other religion symbols.
A week late in my back way to Addis Ababa I come on that cemetery to see what was happening with that grave cross. It was not difficult for me to see that already as stone “cementing” eggs-sand cross was fixed in traditional vertical way and my try to cut a piece by that cross-casting stone was difficult. The strong sun and the wind and the eggs-glue were hardened all mysteriously as stone.
Having that practical demonstration for me was very easy to understand the technology that uses the Egyptians to produce his Pyramids several millenniums ago. That poor Ethiopian man show me the simple discovery that become invented near Nile river for producing stones and to build in that way those miracle that amazed – the Giza World.
All stay very simple! In Egypt sand exist every around. Next to the big river at night is possible to be collected millions eggs by many different birds. The sand is here, the glue /eggs/ also is here. The sun temperature dry quickly and harden that mixture and the Pyramids part, by part are ready in less time as few mounts. For one engineering project as a middle size Pyramids probably are enough to work as slaves not more that a thousand men.
Evidently the majority of the slaves are capturing by the Solomon’s people. The Moses action with the realized freedom by dividing the Read Sea stays as evidence by the Bible about big and heavy work.
But if we reconstruct now how is possible similar engineering project to be done now it is not very difficult we to understand as all stay very simple and do not exist some exceptional. The eggs-glue-cementing and the Sahara sand is the stone material for the famous Pharaohs Pyramids.
They are coming two different questions by that Egypt engineering. First how and who did that discovery by egg-glue and the sand mixture create stone. It is visible at the morning when egg become squashed in sand by human step after until the next morning already is formed small stone. As it is stonily-dry not any insect or microorganisms can destroy that kind of boll. Even the termites are indifferent. Next important geographical consideration must be as remarkable moment. That area is meteorologically rain-less, dry, desert area in Africa. That with millenniums years without water over the Pyramids saved those buildings by destruction. Certainly some parts by the surface are deformed by many other reasons. The winds here exist, but all in the back we have long time of distances before us and our epoch.
The other questions are connected with the numbers of the slaves that are need for all working the Pyramid projects. By my understanding not many slaves are need even for the Cheops Pyramid. It is not problem near the grasses near Nile at day and night to be collected marvelous quantity of eggs by all kind of birds. The sand in Sahara is not problem for use. The producing different baskets or containers as for sand and eggs are also possible to be manufactured all by hands by the slaves.
The Cheops Pyramid is created by blocks as correct ‘stones’ – over and over ‘masonry’ work.
The feeding about 1000 slaves is not real problem for proceedings. Near Nile River and inside exist fish and many as birds also many other animals as real easy food. The Ethiopians eat also now raw meat salted or mixed with black paper powder.
As are published many fantastic “evidences” for the buildings of the Cheops Pyramid are captured 3 millions of slaves. That is impossible by many reasons. If at the same time in one location are concentrated 3,000,000 people as slaves needs not less 6-7 millions of Pharaohs soldiers to be his guarding. All that kind of community need to eat and any organization of that potential society existed by enemy duality must act many riots and revolts. As we have the evidences of survived Pyramids that are evidence also in direction as the man-power must be organized by some levels of agreements with the “slaves” and the slave-holders.
Evidently a revolt in the ancient Egypt is known only by the activity by the Moses escaping the Jewish people and we have not any similarity late as the Spartacus revolt in the Roman Empery. If exists some over with Moses will be added some also mysteriously, but that we haven’t any notes by the prehistory.
Now internet do not offer any correct way of understanding the Egyptian engineering’s with the masonry and manufacturing of the Pyramids.
By: Internet: Culture Focus.com Exploring the World
How were the pyramids built?
It seems likely that the Pyramids of Giza were not built by slaves but by paid laborers motivated by a faith in the divinity and immortality of their kings. Exactly how the pyramids were built is unclear*. It is likely that a sloping embankment was built up to or around the pyramid. The huge blocks would then have been hauled on sledges with the aid of rollers, papyrus ropes and levers. Although most stone was quarried locally at Giza, some had to be transported to the site along the Nile.
• * Underlined and in italics by me – I. Azmanov
About the technology “eggs-glue-sand” is possible manually to be formed stone in way of very high quality. The castings applications are the bamboo wooden sticks and large palm lives, also some algae by the Nile water. In very precisely new archaeological investigations is possible to be find the real details in using all unknown and review those used method.
But my happy event in my meeting with the man in Ethiopia offer me the key of answering the main moment in the secrets of the Egyptians genial builders and it is very strange as over 2300 years that secret was really unknown. Similar paradox than the same with Archimedes…
It is also reasonable the question why late around Egypt, in Old Judea, in all territory that was hold by the Greeks and late by Romans never become in use that eggs-glue-sand technology? Even in the African Carthage exists similar conditions, but we do not find there similar buildings, because deficiency of all that stay important.
First it is applicable only in the territory of Egypt. Nile River is the “planet” of the birds. The Egyptian Sun is next moment. And also the discovery of that invention evidently belongs to the ancient Egyptians only. Also the secret is visible by the name of that country Eg-g-yp-e-t.
Do not exist any data about the real secret and responsible people about the gold and all many treasures for all guaranty how that valuable things and the body of the Pharaoh as God and his actions to save all secrecy, and how that is possible by those confident and devoted responsible how they do that? Probably by killing all witnesses and by that way the secrecy of that technology was unknown also by Archimedes and around all Greeks and Roman favorites late.
How that secrecy become saved in Ethiopia by that person who I met unexpectedly, and why he did all secrecy manually of front of me. He was not educated Ethiopian one. – I can generalize as that was my researchable great chance. I am sorry, as I was without any speech with him as deficiency of language contact and understanding. Also I do not know as the Coptic people, the priests probable they know that simple way for small crosses casting masonry way of production in that way grave-stones. But probably also that is known between only few dedicated. The deeply spiritually pain of the man near town Shashamane and probably my silver coin as gift he accept as highly friendly reaction and he did his job and me become the new dedicated.
The monument of the Adua stone must be produced only by that way of African antic technology.
* * *
It is really strange as that request came for attention now over 2000 years after its false creation. The architectural science do not have answer how are built the pyramids in the old Egypt. Also I have real reason to ask Archimedes for some of his scientific achievements, as they must belongs not to him, as his plagiaries as real mathematically visible comprehensions taken by other civilization and because that not belongs to him. But they belong to the Egyptians, and as the power of the Phalanx destroy all reality, and no one is able to read the Egyptian texts, late, and all secrets stay forgotten for millenniums.*
As the Cheops ( Khufu 2900-2877 B.C.) pyramid was built already 5000 years ago before now and the architects at his epoch how was able to construct all that forms as Archimedes the “creator” and “discoverer” of the triangle all trigonometry the plane geometry the physics the hydrology and many other things was existing about 3000 years late??? !!!
It is amazing how that “stupid” black Egyptians 3000 or 5000 years before Archimedes or more were able to build that forms big and high as mountains. The Egyptians are black people. Egg-yptians, are they because they are coming by the first egg? Or as the egg is his building glue. That is because they must be the first real inventors’ people? And all chicken came from them as comparison. As Archimedes was in Egypt for 12 years it is evidently as he study there all knowledge by the Egypt architects and as his writings was the first in old Greek all late pupils think as the mathematics and all scientific considerations are “discovered” by him. Illusion is that. It is really not acceptable any more because the result by all evidences as the pre-Egyptians have the results of his previous knowledge it is not acceptable as Archimedes is the creator of all mathematics and space measurements sciences. The Egyptians are those. Archimedes is a plagiary man only after them. But he was disabling to re-invent the egg-glue-cementing capability.
That ideal building forms as we have seen near Nile river is amazing and is the absolutely evidence as Archimedes simply was a pupil not diligent scholar under the Egyptians as teachers.
With Pythagoras (497-580 B.C.) we have the same!
Similar is the Greek legend by Aeschylus regarding Prometheus and the theft the fire from the Gods…
It is very understandable as the war between the civilizations at the beginning of the contacting between the different societies and many nations on different levels – racial, national, religion, dominants create conflicts and historically open ways for vanished important technical, engineering military secrets and finally all that belongs to the deepness of the science.
Discussions with Dr. Anita Wolf –
Senior Editor Encyclopedia Britannica /May 6, 2003/
¬
My CV in *Who’s Who in America* – 2003 – Vol. 1 p.196
CV – American Association for the Advancement of Science
Directory of Members – Washington ed. 1998 p.59
Internet Data: CAS Portal
Author:
Iskren Azmanov PhD
Ex Researcher *History of Science*
University of California Santa Barbara
Department of History
Santa Barbara CA 93106 – 9410
USA
Now:
Residence:
1336 Sofia – Lulin bl.210 vh.7 #114
Bulgaria 359-089-673-6807
iazmanov@excite.com