Tag: eusja

  • The Spring issue of EUSJA news is out

    The Spring issue of EUSJA news is out

     

    Click on the image to download the pdf file
    Click on the image to download the pdf file

    The Spring issue of our newsletter has just come out: the first, highlighted articles are also published online.

     

     

  • Study trip to Copenhagen

    Copenhagen

    EUSJA has got 8 invitations to participate 3 days press tour (May 28-30) to Copenhagen focused to biotechnology, medicine and health research in Baltic region. The trip is a part of the ScanBalt Region programme and the BSHR HealthPort project. The goal is to give an insight into the Danish Health and Biotech sector as a practical example. During the tour will be launched an Innovation Agenda giving recommendations on how to create a competitive health economy in the Baltic Sea Region. Health and Bio Economy will be further discussed with the Nordic Council of Ministers and the tour gives presentations of projects, companies, science and

    business parks. The full programme of the study trip with all necessary links has been sent out to EUSJA national associations.

    The conditions are as follows: EUSJA journalists will be offered the accommodation, meal and transfers. They have to cover the traveling to and from Copenhagen by their own. The reimbursement for econom class tickets – upon the request after the trip. The applications must be sent in respect of our rules only via national associations: name, media affiliation, e-mail, mobile. The deadline for applications is May 24.

  • Health journalists: go to Gastein – by Senne Starckx

    From Wesndesday 3rd October until Saturday 6th Ocotber; fifteen EUSJA journalists attended the European Health Forum Gastein 2012.

    Fifteen EUSJA-journalists took the opportunity this year to swap their busy working habitat for the peaceful and quiet Gastein valley, a beautiful setting amidst the majestic Austrian Alps. It’s the kind of place that invites you to take a cure and relax, however, we didn’t have quiet time for that. Four days long, we attended lectures and debates covering the big challenges that European health policy face today. Apart from a very inspiring conference, the European Health Forum Gastein is a unique networking opportunity for health journalists.


    One of the big questions that politicians and policymakers in the European Union face today is how they have to deal with a rapidly aging population. In fact, as demographics has an unstoppable momentum, the question is not how to ‘stop’ aging, but how to create the best limiting conditions for ‘healthy aging’. How can we adapt our – often celebrated – health security systems to the needs of a demographic pyramid that is turned upside down?

     

    If you’re looking for a place where you can spend you elder days in a healthy and highly relaxing way, the two Austrian towns Hofgastein and Gastein are just perfect. It’s all peace and quietness here, with a lot of clean air, sunshine (also in October the weather can be quite warm) and neatness (call it österreichischer Gründlichkeit). In fact, these towns gave me the impression of a giant retirement home – that is, with the highest level of comfort and luxury.

     

    Since fifteen years, the Gastein valley hosts the yearly European Health Forum Gastein (EHFG), a large and quite prestigious event that is high on the agenda of every health policymaker in the EU. Actually, the Forum serves as a meeting place for health experts from quite different backgrounds – the differences between the health security systems of the EU member states are still huge.

     

    The atmosphere during the Forum is quite open. As a critical health journalist, you know you don’t like to find posters of’ ‘big pharma’ everywhere in the conference venue, nor do you like to receive dozens of leaflets that recommend newly developed medicines. Nothing like that in Gastein, where the registration lobby is only brightened up with some posters that tell about recent research on health issues. The organizers of the Forum choose consistently not to play the big pharma card – which distinguishes the Forum from many other similar health events. When a speaker, for example, is in some way connected with industry (for project funding), he has to mention this at the beginning of the session.

    The program of this 15th edition of the Forum was inspired by the current economic and budgetary crisis in the EU. The credo ‘Health in an Age of Austerity’ brought questions together like ‘How can we keep the national health security systems in the EU affordable?’, ‘How do we incorporate new technologies – like social media – in these systems?’, and ‘How can we improve communication about diseases?’. Of course, at the final day of the Forum (Saturday 6th October) these questions didn’t get a univocal answer. But, in fact, some new ideas popped up during the lectures and debates that will undoubtedly grow into new elements of the health security systems of the 21th century. Like the proposal, for example, of the Estonian President (!) who was heavily advocating in Gastein for e-health. E-health is all about integrating simple health applications and tests into smart phones and social media. For example, instead of going to the hospital, you can measure your blood pressure yourself and receive comments of an ‘e-doctor’ – without any cost for you or society.

     

    For us, journalists, these sessions were certainly inspiring, but they didn’t yield us big news stories. However, that’s not what makes the Forum such an interesting event. It’s the opportunity to network with so many leading health experts that makes this event quite unique. And, according to my experience, most of these experts were eager to talk with journalists – another difference with events sponsored by industry.

     

    I don’t think there’s another event in Europe that brings so many interesting people, concerning health issues, together. And thanks to a newly initiated commitment with the newly elected President of the Forum with, Professor Helmut Brand, we journalists are welcome to come back next year and attend the EHFG 2013. And, as Prof. Brand mentioned explicitly during a conversation of the EUSJA delegation this year, we are kindly requested to bring our nasty questions with us.

  • EUSJA Statement on embargoes and manipulation

    EUSJA Statement on embargoes and manipulation

    The European Union of Science Journalists’ Associations (www.eusja.org) condemns the outrageous abuse of the embargo system that was perpetrated a few days ago to manipulate the press in order to get a favourable, acritical coverage of a study on the controversial and important issue of food safety in relationship to genetically modified organisms.

    The incident mentioned above highlights the importance of transparency and ethical behavior in the field of food safety. While there is often pressure to present research in a positive light, it’s crucial to prioritize accuracy and honesty when it comes to issues that impact public health and safety. One way to ensure this is by using reliable and trustworthy food safety testing kits. By using high-quality testing kits, researchers and food safety professionals can obtain accurate and reliable results that can inform policy decisions and help to protect the health and well-being of the public. By upholding ethical standards and prioritizing the use of scientifically sound methods, we can work towards a safer and more transparent food system for all.

    The main reason for embargoes is to give reporters more time to write better stories, and to collect qualified opinions by trusted experts not related to the study.

    In the case of the paper by Seralini et al, journalists received the full-text in advance only after signing a non-disclosure agreement barring them from contacting any independent expert before publication.

    Such non-disclosure agreements go against the rationale for embargoes, and transform them from a useful tool to help science journalists to better inform the public into a tool for manipulating the media, and must then be condemned as unacceptable and unethical for journalists and for scientists.

    Science must be open to outside scrutiny by the society, and by the press.

    Signed unanimously by the EUSJA board
    (Barbie Drillsma, UK; Viola Egikova, Russia; Elmar Veerman,The Netherlands;
    Wolfgang Goede, Germany; Menelaos Sotiriou, Greece; Fabio Turone, Italy)
    in Bad Gastein, October 4th 2012.

    Follows an excerpt of the results of the initial review by the The European Food Safety Authority:

    «The European Food Safety Authority has concluded that a recent paper raising concerns about the potential toxicity of genetically modified (GM) maize NK603 and of a herbicide containing glyphosate is of insufficient scientific quality to be considered as valid for risk assessment.

    EFSA’s initial review found that the design, reporting and analysis of the study, as outlined in the paper, are inadequate. To enable the fullest understanding of the study the Authority has invited authors Séralini et al to share key additional information.»
    Link to the press-release: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/121004.htm